Posted in : Opinion , cyclosis , TV , TV| Tagged : opinion , TikTok , trump

As Jan. 19th inches closer , incoming POTUS Donald Trump say he will " most likely " wait implement the practice of law ostracize TikTok in the U.S.

Though the move to block the app is set to start out this Sunday , it ’s been reported that President Bidenisn’t planning on enforce the lawwhen it does – mean that what would happen next would be up to Trump . Though he go bad to push a sale of the app in 2020 , Trump has warm up up to the idea of keep TikTok around . In later December 2024 , Trump asked the Supreme Court to put a stay on the constabulary taking effect . After he ’s sworn in , Trump could require the Justice Department not to enforce the jurisprudence or peradventure come out an Executive Order suspend the enforcement for 60 to 90 Clarence Day .   Here ’s a look at the argument that TikTok released on Friday Nox , keep up by a video reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court ’s decision from in the first place today :

TikTok Hit with Second Worst News of 2024: Donald Trump Joins App

Statement on Possible Shutdown

The statements supply today by both the Biden White House and the Department of Justice have failed to provide the necessary clarity and assurance to the divine service supplier that are integral to assert TikTok ’s availability to over 170 million …

— TikTok Policy ( @TikTokPolicy)January 18 , 2025

Our response to the Supreme Court conclusion : https://t.co / xSkvkOgpuV

— TikTok Policy ( @TikTokPolicy)January 17 , 2025

" There is no dubiousness that , for more than 170 million Americans , TikTok offers a typical and heroic wall socket for expression , means of participation , and source of residential area , " the justices write in an unsigned popular opinion on their unanimous determination . " But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to cover its well - stomach home security concerns regarding TikTok ’s data collection practices and human relationship with a strange resister . For the throw overboard reasons , we conclude that the dispute provisions do not violate petitioner ' First Amendment rights . " JusticeSonia Sotomayorwrote an sentiment concurring in part and concurring in the mind , while JusticeNeil Gorsuchwrote an persuasion concurring in the judgement .

Enjoyed this ? Please share on societal medium !