Posted in : streaming , TV| Tagged : china , TikTok , trump
TikTok posted a message to U.S. user via the app that the Jan. nineteenth ban was 60 minutes forth and that service could be " temporarily unavilable . "
UPDATE : With only hours to go until the U.S. jurisprudence banning TikTok break down into effect ( though there are still questions if it will be enforced – more on that below ) , the ByteDance - own app is set drug user / checking to see who will blink first with the espouse message when you go onto the app :
Though the move to block the app is set to start this Sunday , it ’s been reported that President Bidenisn’t plan on enforce the lawwhen it does – meaning that what would encounter next would be up to Trump . Though he failed to force a cut-rate sale of the app in 2020 , Trump has warm up to the thought of keeping TikTok around . In late December 2024 , Trump ask the Supreme Court to put a stay on the natural law taking effect . After he ’s sworn in , Trump could ask the Justice Department not to enforce the law or possibly issue an Executive Order suspending the enforcement for 60 to 90 days . Here ’s a face at the statement that TikTok released on Friday dark , watch by a video recording reaction to the U.S. Supreme Court ’s determination from in the beginning today :
Statement on Possible Shutdown
The statements issued today by both the Biden White House and the Department of Justice have fail to provide the necessary uncloudedness and assurance to the service provider that are constitutional to maintaining TikTok ’s accessibility to over 170 million …
— TikTok Policy ( @TikTokPolicy)January 18 , 2025
Our response to the Supreme Court decision : https://t.co / xSkvkOgpuV
— TikTok Policy ( @TikTokPolicy)January 17 , 2025
" There is no doubt that , for more than 170 million Americans , TikTok offer a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression , way of engagement , and generator of community , " the justices wrote in an unsigned sentiment on their unanimous decision . " But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to direct its well - supported national security worry regarding TikTok ’s data point collection practices and family relationship with a foreign adversary . For the foregoing reasons , we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners ' First Amendment right . " JusticeSonia Sotomayorwrote an opinion hold in part and concurring in the judgment , while JusticeNeil Gorsuchwrote an opinion concurring in the judgment .
Enjoyed this ? Please partake on social media !
